Cloning Essay Research Paper As a human free essay sample

Cloning Essay, Research Paper As a human race, we have pursued changeless technological patterned advance and promotion. Indeed, our claim to the rubric of? superior race? can be attributed in portion to the ardor in which we go about bettering our ain being through innovation and find. Thankss to progresss in medical specialty, we have increased the overall lifetime of work forces and adult females. Due to uninterrupted betterments in industrial engineering, machines now do virtually everything for us that our ascendants had to make with their ain custodies. Every twenty-four hours, something is created that makes our lives easier. We are blessed with an mind higher than that of any other animal on Earth, and we make unembarrassed usage of it. Quite perchance, our ascendants foresaw the twenty-four hours when our rational capacity would take us in a way that we would be badly prepared to follow. That twenty-four hours has arrived with the development of cloning. The cloning of sheep, cattles, toads, and other animate beings has already been successfully completed and human cloning is now a realistic possibility, the lone restraints being the ethical and moral issues associated with reproducing a perfect transcript of another human being. In? The Paradox of Cloning? , the writer, James Q. Wilson, argues the benefits of cloning and asserts? the additions will turn out to transcend the hazards? . Wilson is incorrect in his premise. While I concede that cloning engineering offers some exciting benefits, entire human cloning besides carries terrorization, world-wide branchings. While cloning is still in the babyhood phase, we, as a worldwide society, should jointly reject any attempts to farther engineering in the country of human cloning. Wilson provinces that we need non respond instantly to human cloning. He cites the 277 efforts that it took to clone one sheep, and insists that the route to human cloning will be? long and hard? . I fail to see the logic here. Regardless of how long successfully cloning a human really takes, leting research labs to continue with research and development would be a error. In leting the procedure to get down, we are basically doing the determination to legalise cloning. Advocates would wish nil more than to be given the green visible radiation to continue with experimental research. Half of their conflict would be over and eventual cloning would be inevitable. It is irresponsible to state that we need non worry about it because it is a long manner off. To reason that we need non turn to the issue of cloning now is comparable to reding immature parents non to worry about college for their kids because the possibility is 18 long old ages off. In inquiring society to look the other manne r while cloning is in the developmental stage, Wilson? s motivations appear leery. Possibly, he knows that by leting one million millions of dollars to get down pouring in for the intent of subsidising cloning research, we are efficaciously opening a door that can non be shut. Suppose that human cloning is permitted and deemed legal. Contrary to Wilson? s beliefs, it would be a really short clip before we possess the scientific cognition necessary to successfully clone a human. In fact, scientists at Advanced Cell Technology have already cloned a human embryo by shooting familial stuff into a cow egg. The embryo was allowed to populate for 12 yearss before it was destroyed, chiefly to pre-empt the inevitable ethical call ( Sung 1 ) . An embryo, it seems, can non be considered human until it attaches itself to the wall of the uterus, which occurs at about 14 yearss. In leting the patterned advance of cloning, we must see one basic issue. How do we manage the failures and errors that occur during the early experimental phases? Many eggs were destroyed at assorted phases of development before scientists were able to make Dolly the sheep, the first successfully cloned animate being ( Bailey ) . What happens to the human embryos that live to be a to the full de veloped foetus before scientist discover a? defect? in their Deoxyribonucleic acid? Do we fling these babes and go on on in the name of scientific discipline? And how do we manage immature kids ringers that start to demo marks of a weakened immune system? Do we slay these kids and name them an experimental loss or do we construct orphanhoods to house the early misfit ringers? Who wants to explicate to these childs that they merely will neer be good plenty because it merely isn? T in their cistrons? Keep in head we? re non speaking about a few kids here and at that place. Hundreds of biotechnology houses worldwide are eager to come in the kingdom of cloning research, each with virtually limitless fundss. All of these companies will probably digest 100s of failed efforts before one successful ringer is created. Complicating affairs, there will be a race between these houses to be the first company to successfully clone a human being. This environment will non impart itself to patient, measured progresss but alternatively to countless errors due to the manic gait of the experimental research. As a society, we should non gull ourselves into believing that we will be the helpers of cloning without first destructing 1000s of lives in the procedure. Upon honing the cloning procedure, another inquiry would still stay. Make we truly want to clone human existences? Anyone who can reply yes to this inquiry must be willing to release the individualism and uniqueness that we now enjoy. No thirster would single endowments set us apart because any endowment would be consistent. Michael Jordan wouldn? T stand out any more than any other hoops participant if his athletic abilities were available off the shelf at the local biotech clinic. Mark McGuire? s alone endowment for oppressing a baseball would be second-rate if we stocked every squad with a ringer that possessed his same ability. What merriment would watching any athletics be if all jocks were indistinguishable in skill degree? Competition is indispensable to all athleticss and cloning would virtually extinguish competition by mass-producing jocks with indistinguishable athletic ability. What would we larn in music grasp if Mozarts, Bachs, and Beethovens were a dime a twelve? How valuable would a Rembrandt picture be if every museum paid a Rembrandt ringer to bring forth their ain plants. And the atrociousnesss do non halt at that place. A company wishing to increase productiveness could use merely ringers that were genetically designed to be indefatigable and persevering workers, neer necessitating a interruption or clip off. How could the remainder of U s? genetically challenged? people hope to even set down a occupation? Suppose you graduate with a grade in mathematics, trusting to carry through your dream of going a instructor, merely to larn that the schools and colleges are staffed with Einstein ringers that possess knowledge far superior to yours. Their cognition would be born from an deep-rooted familial disposition whereas yours would come merely from difficult work. You need non be an Einstein, or an Einstein ringer, to place the also-ran in this state of affairs. Human cloning holds many possibilities that would be damaging to mankind in merely this mode. Thankfully, to day of the month, legislators are keeping off the moving ridge of protagonists and lobbyists forcing for the legalisation of cloning. In censoring federal financess from being used for cloning research, President Bill Clinton stated that, ? Any find that touches upon human creative activity is non merely a affair of scientific enquiry, it is a affair of morality and spiritualty every bit good? Each human life is alone, born of a miracle that reaches beyond research lab scientific discipline? ? ( Odyssey 3 ) . Harmonizing to a Time/CNN canvass, most people echo this sentiment. In the canvass, an overpowering 89 per centum of Americans feel that it is? morally unacceptable? to clone worlds ( Sung ) . With approximately 9 out of 10 people in resistance, it appears that most people see the bloodcurdling possibilities of human cloning as a world waiting to go on. While pulling the line at complete human cloning, there are still many benefits to be derived from this new engineering. I would venture to state that the bulk of people opposed to cloning would non deny the promise that lies therein for the intervention of disease, malformations, and other familial defects. The engineering that exists now has armed us with a new cognition that has far-reaching promise. We stand on the threshold of witnessing the riddance, or at the really least, drastic decreases of everything from sterility to leukemia. For illustration, through cloning of single cells, a leukaemia patient could have an extract of bone marrow grown outside his organic structure that matches his ain absolutely. There would be no danger of rejection or the demand to take powerful anti-rejection drugs, which have a long list of side effects. Burn victims could have skin transplants of wholly healthy spots of new tegument, dramatically cut downing marking. Peoples with macular devoluti on, a disease that destroys vision, could have a graft of healthy retinal tissue, guaranting that they would non be robbed of their vision ( Nash ) . In add-on, organ graft receivers would have variety meats that are about indistinguishable transcripts of their ain, one time once more extinguishing the possibility of rejection. Ppl Therapeutics, the same Scotland company that produced Dolly, besides successfully cloned 5 female hogs and touted them as a major measure in the field of organ transplant. Physiologically, hogs are one of the closest animate beings to worlds and by genetically changing the Deoxyribonucleic acid of a hog, variety meats could be grown that could subsequently be? successfully transplanted into humans. ? Dave Ayares, frailty president of research at Ppl Therapeutics, says? It has the possible to basically revolutionise the organ transplant field? ( WFMY ) . While these illustrations might look like futuristic scenarios, they are really realistic possibilities that are on the really near skyline. New and advanced techniques are being continuously developed as research progresses at a ferocious gait. In fact, Ppl claims that organ transplant of genetically altered hog variety meats could get down in every bit small as four old ages. This is non a engineering that offers promise for merely our kids and ulterior coevalss, but one in which we ourselves stand to profit. Dr. Robert Winston of London? s Hammersmith Hospital says, ? Given its possible benefit, I would reason that it would be unethical non to go on this line of research. ? ( Nash ) . I agree with Dr. Winston in his contention that we should decidedly continue with research in this field. Although adamantly opposed to the freak of human cloning, I feel that single cell cloning for the intent of handling disease and progressing organ transplant engineering is an sphere that we must come in into. Historically, we have taken advantage of every new engineering made available. In many instances, engineering has enriched our lives with small or no disadvantages. I believe that our desire to better our being through new innovations or finds has finally created a better universe for future coevalss. However, human cloning must be considered an exclusion. Although a true wonder, human cloning would finally take to a black result. Our uniqueness and individualism were non meant to be tampered with, as they are the kernel of human nature. Variations in personality and mind are what drive us to be the people we are. Individual differences are an built-in portion of our society. Making? perfect? ringers and? weeding out? our imperfectnesss threatens to destruct that environment and, consequentially, do for an improbably deadening universe to populate in. Our society has reached a threshold that would be morally and ethically incorrect to traverse. I assert that we can harvest the benefi ts of cloning engineering without traversing that threshold. The realisation is upon us that, for one time, we need to maintain our technological thrust in cheque. It is imperative that society makes a corporate statement now. Yes, we want to make all that is possible to battle disease, through all possible agencies. Yes, we want to progress transplant engineering to where people are non deceasing because of a failed organ. Yes, we want to offer new life to people with familial lacks or malformations. No, we do non desire to construct the Frankenstein monster of the new millenary. Plants Cited Bailey, Ronald. Send in the Clones. June 1998. *http: //www.reason.com./9806/bk.bailey.html* 1 March 2000 Nash, J. Madeleine. The Case for Cloning. 9 February 1998. *http: //www.time.com/time/magazine/1998/dom/980209 1 March 2000 Odyssey.com. Potential Benefits of Plant and Animal Cloning. 8 August 1997. *http: //www.ncgr.org/gpi/odyssey/dolly* 3 March 2000 Sung, Ellen. First Human Embryo Cloned. 3 March 2000. *http: //www.policy.com/news/dbrief/dbriefarc265.asp* 5 March 2000 The Good Morning Show. Robert Marshall. WFMY Channel 2. 14 March 2000.